武汉大学课题组2025年4月在《Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering》期刊揭晓了题为“Monotonic triaxial testing and hypoplastic modelling of calcareous sand: A focus on particle breakage and initial relative density”(钙质砂的枯燥三轴试验与低塑性建?????帕F扑橛氤跏枷喽悦芏鹊鸟詈闲вΓ┗诠阋寮粲Ρ涞母飨蛞煨怨探岜ズ蜕巴脸部籽股つW印钡难趼畚。。。。。本研究接纳GDS自动三轴仪试验系统,,,,开展枯燥三轴与亚塑性建模,,,,聚焦颗粒破碎与初始相对密度对钙质砂应力-应变-临界状态的耦合影响,,,,提出统一破碎演化方程,,,,构建可展望级配、强度与变形的新型亚塑性模子,,,,为岛礁与离岸工程填筑体抗震变形剖析提供本构基础。。。。。

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.04.018
*论文版权归原作者和出书方所有,,,,本文仅为学习交流。。。。。
以下是对这项效果的简要先容:
论文摘要
钙质砂的应力–应变特征受颗粒破碎(B)与初始相对密度(Dri)显著影响,,,,但现有本构模子少少同时思量二者的耦相助用。。。。。为填补这一空缺,,,,本文针对差别Dri和应力路径的钙质砂开展系列三轴试验,,,,系统研究颗粒破碎与临界状态行为。。。。。
主要发明如下:(1)当应力比(η)恒准时,,,,B随平均有用应力(p')呈双曲线关系;;给定p'下,,,,B随η线性增大;;(2)临界状态线(CSL)随Dri增大而下移,,,,而临界状态摩擦角(φcs)随B增大而减小。。。。;;谏鲜鲂Ч,,,提出统一的颗粒破碎演化模子,,,,用以量化差别加载条件下钙质砂的破碎水平。。。。。将该模子与正常固结线(NCL)及CSL方程耦合,,,,乐成再现随B增大、NCL与CSL斜率增大的征象,,,,并定量评估B对φcs的影响。。。。。最后,,,,在临界状态土力学与亚塑性理论框架内,,,,建设了同时引入B与Dri的亚塑性模子;;该模子在差别初始相对密度、应力路径及排水条件下的模拟效果与试验数据高度吻合,,,,验证了其可靠性。。。。。
试验装备
本研究使用了GDS自动三轴仪GDSTAS等装备。。。。。

实验要领及相关图表
*图表为论文截图,,,,版权归论文原作者和出书方所有,,,,本文仅为学习交流。。。。。

Fig. 1. Physical properties of calcareous sand: (a) SEM image; and (b) Grain size distribution (GSD) curve of calcareous sand.


Fig. 2. Test schematic and apparatus: (a) Test schematic; and (b) GDS triaxial automated system.

Fig. 3. Effect of initial densities on the triaxial test results of calcareous sand: (a-b) CTC test, pc=200 kPa; (c-d) TC test, pc=200 kPa; (e-f) RTC test, pc=200 kPa; (g-h) CU test, pc=200 kPa; (i-j) CTC test, pc=800 kPa; (k-l) TC test, pc=800 kPa; (m-n) RTC test, pc=800 kPa; and (o-p) CU test, pc=800 kPa

Fig. 4. Variation in GSD curves of calcareous sand and relationship between B with p′ and η: (a-b) Effect of Dri; (c-d) Effect of pc; and (e-f) Effect of loading path.

Fig. 5. Relationship between B with p' and η: (a) B- log10 p' relation; and (b) Determination of ω0 and kω (Solid colourful lines represent simulation results by Eq. (8))

Fig. 6. Stress ratio of calcareous sand sheared to maximum axial strain: (a) CTC test; (b) TC test; (c) RTC test; and (d) CU test.

Fig. 7. Comparison of B-p' relations with different test results: (a) Dogs Bay sand; (b) Angular granite (PL: Proportional loading); and (c) Decomposed granite.

Fig. 8. Predicted and measured NCLs of calcareous sand with various initial densities. (a) Predicted versus experimental test results; (b) Influence of kDr (Eq. (36)); and (c) Influence of kB (Eq. (36)).

Fig. 9. Predicted and measured CSLs of calcareous sand with various initial densities: (a) Dri=0.1; (b) Dri =0.3; (c) Dri =0.6; and (d) Dri =0.9.

Fig. 10. Schematic of the effect of particle breakage on the location of CSL in e-log10p' plane

Fig. 11. Influence of parameter χ and β on predicted results: (a) Effect of χ (Eq. (44)); and (b) Effect of β (Eq. (44)).

Fig. 12. Relationship between critical friction angle φcs with particle breakage B of calcareous sand: (a) Experimental data; and (b) Effect of χB on predicted Mcs (Eq. (48)).

Fig. 13. Influence of breakage evolution parameters on model prediction results in drained triaxial test: (a-b) Effect of ω0; (c-d) Effect of kω; and (e-f) Effect of pB.

Fig. 14. Influence of initial density effect parameters on model prediction results in drained triaxial test: (a-b) Effect of Dri; (c-d) Effect of kDr; and (e-f) Effect of χ.

Fig. 15. Influence of breakage effect parameters on model prediction results in drained triaxial test: (a-b) Effect of kB; (c-d) Effect of β; and (e-f) Effect of χB.

Fig. 16. Comparison between model predictions with CTC tests results of calcareous sand at different Dri: (a-b) Dri =0.1; (c-d) Dri =0.3; (e-f) Dri =0.6; and (g-h) Dri =0.9.

Fig. 17. Comparison between model predictions with CU tests results of calcareous sand at different Dri: (a-b) Dri =0.1; (c-d) Dri =0.3; (e-f) Dri =0.6; and (g-h) Dri =0.9.

Fig. 18. Comparison between model predictions with TC tests results of calcareous sand at different Dri: (a-b) Dri =0.1; (c-d) Dri =0.3; (e-f) Dri =0.6; and (g-h) Dri =0.9.

Fig. 19. Comparison between model predictions with RTC tests results of calcareous sand at different Dri: (a-b) Dri =0.1; (c-d) Dri =0.3; (e-f) Dri =0.6; and (g-h) Dri =0.9.

Fig. 20. Comparison of the predicted and measured values of B

Fig. 21. Change in GSD of calcareous sand with Dri=0.1:(a-b) CTC test; (c-d) TC test; (e-f) RTC test; and (g-h) CU test.

Fig. 22 Comparison between model predictions with drained triaxial tests results of Silica sand at different Dri: (a-b) Dri =0.30; (c-d) Dri =0.60; and (e-f) Dri=0.90.
研究结论
现有本构模子未能充分思量颗粒破碎(B)与初始相对密度(Dri)对钙质砂的耦合影响。。。。。为此,,,,本文开展了系列三轴压缩试验,,,,涵盖差别Dri、应力路径与排水条件。。。。;;谑匝樾Ч,,,提出了新的破碎演化模子,,,,并修正了正常固结线(NCL)与临界状态线(CSL)方程,,,,以同时纳入B与Dri的联相助用。。。。。随后,,,,将这些公式嵌入亚塑性框架,,,,建设了刷新的亚塑性本构模子。。。。。主要结论如下:
(1)三轴试验批注,,,,B与Dri对强度与变形具有显著且相互依赖的影响。。。。。低围压下B较。。。。。,,,Dri起主导作用;;随围压增大,,,,B增添,,,,Dri的影响削弱。。。。。
(2)颗粒破碎主要受应力比η与平均有用应力p′控制。。。。。η恒准时,,,,B随p′增大而升高;;p′恒准时,,,,B与η成正比。。。。。提出的双曲线破碎演化模子仅需3个易标定参数,,,,即可形貌差别应力路径、Dri与围压下的破碎行为。。。。。
(3)新NCL与CSL方程可准确反应随B增大而陡化、随Dri增大而下移的纪律;;临界状态摩擦角φcs随B线性降低。。。。。
(4)将破碎演化模子与修正NCL、CSL方程融入亚塑性框架,,,,建设了可同时思量颗粒破碎与初始密度的扩展亚塑性模子,,,,可准确展望级配演化、强度与变形。。。。。
只管模子展望性能优异,,,,但验证仅限于等向固结与枯燥加载。。。。。现实岛礁与离岸工程常面临各向异性应力与风波循环荷载,,,,后续研究将拓展模子至这些重大工况,,,,提升其工程适用性。。。。。
备注:论文及摘要等为论文原文的中文译文,,,,仅供快速参考;;若遇语义或手艺细节歧义,,,,请以英文原文为准。。。。。完整研究内容、参数取值及验证数据请查阅原文。。。。。
在线咨询